Legal Opinion
United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1956PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. to dismiss the above-entitled action as against the defendants Lyon MeCandless and Clare Paquin (also known as Clare P. McCandless) on the ground that this action is in the wrong district because (1) the jurisdiction of this Court is invoked solely on the ground that the action arises under the Constitution and the laws of the United States; and (b) that said defendants do not reside in this district.
The said defendants are husband and wife and are living together.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davidson Bros. Marble Co. v. United States Ex Rel. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- International Refugee Organization v. Republic S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Townsend v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Koons v. KaiserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sharp Electronics Corporation v. Hayman Cash Register CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Indymac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. v. ReyadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Rappoport v. Steven Spielberg, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Champion Spark Plug Company v. KarchmarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Goldberg v. Wharf ConstructersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.