Legal Opinion
Sharp Electronics Corporation v. Hayman Cash Register Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 4, 1981No. 80-1610PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-appellant, Sharp Electronics Corp. (Sharp), filed an action in the District Court for the District of Columbia alleging violations of the Sherman Act by four defendants. Two of the defendants, Talco Cash Register Co. (Talco), a New Jersey corporation doing business in New Jersey, and its president, Hiram M. Tallmadge, Jr., a resident of New Jersey, moved to dismiss the complaint for, inter alia, improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (1976). The district court found that “even a casual reading of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hayman Cash Register Co. v. SarokinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Williams v. GEICO CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- James v. VERIZON SERVICES CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Exponential Biotherapies, Inc. v. Houthoff Buruma N.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Capital Bank International Ltd. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.