Koons v. Kaiser
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
The defendants have made the following motions:(1) to quash service and return of summons on, and to dismiss the action as to, defendant Kaiser Colorado Company (hereinafter referred to as “Colorado”) upon the ground that the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of California and was not and is not licensed to do or doing •business in New York State and is therefore not subject to service of process within the State of New York;(2) to quash service and return of summons on, and to dismiss the action as to, defendant Kaiser Steel Corporation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Penrod Drilling Company v. Sam H. Johnson and James L. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Cunard Line Ltd. v. AbneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- JOSCAR COMPANY v. Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Champion Spark Plug Company v. KarchmarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Goldberg v. Wharf ConstructersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.