Legal Opinion
Rappoport v. Steven Spielberg, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 26, 1998No. Civil Action 97-5742 (AJL)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action brought by pro se plaintiff, Jay L. Rappoport, (“Rappaport”) against defendants, Steven Spielberg (“Spielberg”), Amblin Entertainment (“Amblin”), Michael Ovitz (“Ovitz”), Creative Artists Agency (“CAA”), Industrial Light and Magic (“ILM”), Universal City Studios, Inc. (“Universal”), 1 Jeffrey Montgomery (“Montgomery”), Harvey Entertainment (“Harvey”), Warner Brothers (“Warner Bros.”), Time Warner, Inc. (“Time Warner”), Turner Pictures Worldwide, Inc. (“Turner Pictures”), Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. (“TBS”), Hanna-Barbera, Inc.…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lawrence v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- MaxLite, Inc. v. ATG Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Liggett Group Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. 11C MusicDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001
- Catanese v. UnileverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.