Call v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
— By this proceeding, petitioner seeks review of a recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that he be suspended from the practice of law for the period of one year.
Petitioner was admitted to practice law in this state in 1930. About the middle of May 1951 he was consulted by Lorenzo Crounse regarding the feasibility of contesting the will of Crounse’s father, who had died in 1950 leaving an estate worth several hundred thousand dollars. The will bequeathed $10,000 to Crounse, the testator’s only child, and contained a disinheritance clause under which any legatee…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Fitzsimmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.