Legal Opinion

Call v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1955No. S. F. 19151PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— By this proceeding, petitioner seeks review of a recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that he be suspended from the practice of law for the period of one year.

Petitioner was admitted to practice law in this state in 1930. About the middle of May 1951 he was consulted by Lorenzo Crounse regarding the feasibility of contesting the will of Crounse’s father, who had died in 1950 leaving an estate worth several hundred thousand dollars. The will bequeathed $10,000 to Crounse, the testator’s only child, and contained a disinheritance clause under which any legatee…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fitzsimmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API