Tevis v. Ellis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
The complaint states that on the 20th of August, 1862, the plaintiff was, and is now, the owner in fee simple absolute of certain lots in the City of San Francisco, and that he is in the actual possession of the lots by his tenant.
That on the 20th of August, 1862, the plaintiff recovered a judgment for the possession of the lots in an action brought by him against Daniel O’Connell.
*517That notice of Us pendens was filed in the Recorder’s office, March 13, 1862, the day the action was commenced.
That pending the suit, O’Connell made a deed of the premises to Calderwood,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tomlinson v. RubioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Ford v. RigbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williamson v. RussellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Huerstal v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Arrieta v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Le Roy v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.