Legal Opinion

Ford v. Rigby

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, County of Yuba.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.

Arnold leased some furniture to Burnes. During the lease, plaintiff bought it of Arnold, Burnes remaining in possession, and acknowledging plaintiff’s title. In this condition, it was levied on by Irwin, on process of Rigby against Arnold. Plaintiff filed this bill to enjoin the sale. Defendants made default, and plaintiff had 'judgment. The only question is, whether an injunction is proper under such circumstances. The question is not as to a levy on the estate of a lessee, for here the property was seized to pay the debt of a stranger to the title.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tevis v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API