Legal Opinion

Kanuk Ex Rel. Kanuk v. State, Department of Natural Resources

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2014No. 6953 S-14776PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The appellants in this case are minors from communities across Alaska who claim that the State has violated its duties under the Alaska Constitution and the public trust doctrine by failing to take steps to protect the atmosphere in the face of significant and potentially disastrous climate change. The minors argue that the superior court erred when it dismissed their complaint on grounds that their claims were not justiciable-specif-ically, that the claims involved political questions best answered by other branches of state government. On that basis we…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. DeVilbiss v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Juliana v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  5. PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API