Legal Opinion
Bari v. Control Data Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 1989No. C4-88-1783PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant Robert L. Bari brought suit against respondent Control Data Corporation for breach of employment contract and discrimination on the basis of age and disability and failure to make reasonable accommodation under Minn.Stat. § 363.03 (1986). The contract claim was tried to the jury and the discrimination claims were tried to the court. Judgment was entered for Control Data on all claims. Bari appeals from the order denying his motion for new trial. We affirm.
FACTS
Bari, age 53 at the time of trial, was employed by Control Data from 1968 to 1985, when his employment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Ogema v. BevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Empire State Bank v. DevereauxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Berry v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Danielson v. HanfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Tews v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brooks v. Doherty, Rumble & ButlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third partyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Brooks v. Doherty, Rumble & ButlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992