Legal Opinion

Doyle v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1998No. 96-246PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Gary Dean Doyle appeals the Judgment and Sentence entered for his conviction of grand larceny in violation of W.S. 6-3-402(a) and (c)(i) (1997). We affirm.

ISSUES

Doyle presents these issues:

I. Were the incriminating statements made by the Appellant to Officer Broz while in custody and without being read his Miranda rights voluntary under the totality of the circumstances?

II. Was the arrest of Appellant unlawful because the affidavit supporting the arrest warrant was false and misleading and signed by a judge who was not neutral and detached?

III. Was the Appellant denied his…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mitchell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rodriguez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Bhutto v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API