Legal Opinion

Billis v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1990No. 88-311, 89-4, 88-312, 88-250, 88-304 and 88-310PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

In these consolidated cases we must answer several constitutional questions concerning W.S. 7-13-301 (June 1987 Repl.) (hereinafter “new 301”). “New 301” is a probation statute that applies to a criminal defendant who has never before been convicted of a felony and is presently charged with, has pleaded guilty to, or has been found guilty of an offense within a certain group of felonies and misdemeanors. Under the statute, if both the defendant and the state consent, the court may defer further prosecution proceedings and place the defendant on probation without entry of a…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Phillips v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bitz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API