Legal Opinion

Bhutto v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2005No. 04-89PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] The appellant was convicted of premeditated first-degree murder for killing Valerie McCarthy. The appellant raises numerous issues concerning the proceedings that led to his conviction, the constitutionality of the sentence imposed upon him, and the delay in docketing this appeal. We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Did the district court err in not suppressing statements the appellant made to law enforcement officers?

2. Did the district court err in admitting certain uncharged misconduct evidence?

3. Did the district court err in admitting certain photographs into evidence?

4. Did…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dharminder Vir Sen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Winters v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API