Legal Opinion
Lupinacci v. City of Stamford
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 7, 2002No. File No. CV-990172376PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HON. WILLIAM B. LEWIS,
JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
The defendant city of Stamford moves to dismiss the present action on the ground that the plaintiffs, Charles Lupinacci and Alfred Lupinacci, lack standing to sue. The city argues that at the time the present action was commenced, the plaintiffs were not the owners of the premises at issue and that those premises were owned by Colonial Land Limited Partnership (Limited), a Delaware partnership. In support, the city has submitted copies of the land records of the city of Stamford, which reveal that on December 30, 1998, there were recorded instruments…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Lettieri v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- World Fire & Marine Insurance v. Alliance Sandblasting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Solomon v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Retirement Management Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. ZembaConnecticut Superior Court · 2004