Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Zemba
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 16, 2004No. File No. CV-03-0484071SPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorradino, J.
Before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant, Christopher K. Zemba. The motion filed by the plaintiff Marvin Wilson, Jr., to substitute Tymar Wilson as plaintiff and request to amend *543the complaint arise out of the filing of the motion to dismiss and represent an attempt to avoid it. As will be discussed, the motion to dismiss argues that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction over the present case because the complaint identifies the parent, Marvin Wilson, Jr., as the plaintiff and not the minor child, who is named Tymar Wilson.
It is necessary to review the pleadings…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rana v. TerdjanianConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Berlinda Lane, and Edward L. Montedonico, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of Berlinda Lane v. Jacob L. Daniel and Daniel J. LundCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- Fairfield Merrittview Ltd. Partnership v. NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Youngman v. SchiavoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015