Legal Opinion
Russell v. Stephens
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 1937No. 26360. En BancPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Steinert, C. J.
— An opinion in this case directing the affirmance of the judgment below was heretofore rendered and filed in this court on February 1, 1937. Russell v. Stephens, 189 Wash. 233, 64 P. (2d) 787. A petition for rehearing was subsequently granted, and later the cause was re-argued En Banc.
The sole question considered in the former opinion was whether the appellant Stephens, having counterclaimed for damages for breach of the contract set forth in the complaint, thereby acquiesced in the previous rescission of the same by the respondent Russell. The substance of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Stevens v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Reiter v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Kelly v. BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Russell v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by15 opinions
- Herzog Aluminum, Inc. v. General American Window Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- FIRST NAT. BANK ETC. v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- DeCoria v. Red's Trailer Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Karpenski v. American General Life Companies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Loomis v. Imperial Motors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.