Legal Opinion

Beakley v. City of Bremerton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1940No. 28007PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This case involves the personal retention by a city attorney of funds allowed by the city for stenographic services, and also involves his right to employ his wife to do the stenographic work and to be paid by the city.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff, as city attorney for the city of Bremerton, was authorized by the city to employ clerical and stenographic help, and to pay for that service the amount of fifty dollars- per month; that he employed Nelva G. Beakley as his clerk and stenographer at a monthly salary of fifty dollars; that Nelva G. Beakley started to work September 1, 1937, in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Abbott v. WetherbyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re the Estate of MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Plath v. MullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ballard v. SlyfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. K & R Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BeakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kilcup v. McManusWashington Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API