Legal Opinion
Application of Paul Schmidt and Max Wilhelm
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 5, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7758PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner's rejection of product claims 1 and 5 in appellants’ application1 for “Piperazine Sulfonamides.”
The invention relates to the compound piperazine-N :N'-disulfonamide of the formula
The primary issue before us is the sufficiency under 35 U.S.C. § 112 of the disclosure in appellants' specification of the manner and process of using that compound. There it is said that the claimed sulfonamide “assists the liver function in hepatic2 disturbances and can therefore be used as medicament in human and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Walter Lorenz and Richard WeglerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Henri Moureu and Paul ChovinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Robert R. CitronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Odyssey Logistics and Tech. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- In re BorkowskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Application of Paul Schmidt and Max WilhelmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.