Legal Opinion
Application of Paul Diedrich
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 20, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6978PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 6, 10, 13-16, 19, 21 and 26-32 of appellant’s application 1 entitled “X-Ray Contrast Media” on the ground that appellant’s application is not entitled to the filing date of his parent application, 2 and through it to the benefit of the priority date of his German application. 3 No claims have been allowed. 4
The invention relates to certain new compounds which are the derivatives of 3,5-diamino-2,4,6,-triiodo-benzoic acid which are said to be useful as X-ray-contrast…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Walter Lorenz and Richard WeglerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Arnold N. JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Le BaronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- L. & C. Hardtmuth, Inc. v. Fabrique Suisse De Crayons Caran D'Ache S.A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. US Laminating Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Application of Karl Folkers and Clifford H. ShunkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In Re Dane K. Fisher and Raghunath v. LalgudiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.