Legal Opinion

Foster v. McConnell

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1958No. Civ. 18041PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appellant’s petition to the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel respondent Insurance Commissioner to restore his restricted insurance licenses was denied. He appeals.

Questions Presented

1. Was appellant entitled to a trial de novo in the trial court ?

2. Is there substantial evidence to support the findings of the commissioner?

3. Did the commissioner have jurisdiction to discipline appellant for misrepresentations made at Fort Ord, a government reservation?

4. Was there a violation of the United States Constitution or the California Constitution?

Record

Appellant had been licensed as a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Matter of Application of ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rudolph v. Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Elder v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Anserv Insurance Services, Inc. v. KelsoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. County of Contra Costa v. Social Welfare BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Haagensen v. Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API