Legal Opinion

California State Automobile Assn. v. Foster

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1993No. C011971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J. *

In this declaratory relief action defendant Foster appeals from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff insurer, urging he was not an “owner” of the motor vehicle herein, and as a consequence, does not fall within a coverage exclusion contained in the uninsured motorist provision of a policy issued by plaintiff, The appeal presents one basic question: Is a person who parts with possession of a motor vehicle but retains registered title and an equitable interest, an owner within the meaning of a policy provision excluding from uninsured motorist coverage vehicles “owned” by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Suburban Motors, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Votaw v. Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Interinsurance Exchange v. VeljiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Savnik v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Joyce O'Neilin v. Allstate Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API