California State Automobile Assn. v. Foster
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, J. *
In this declaratory relief action defendant Foster appeals from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff insurer, urging he was not an “owner” of the motor vehicle herein, and as a consequence, does not fall within a coverage exclusion contained in the uninsured motorist provision of a policy issued by plaintiff, The appeal presents one basic question: Is a person who parts with possession of a motor vehicle but retains registered title and an equitable interest, an owner within the meaning of a policy provision excluding from uninsured motorist coverage vehicles “owned” by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Suburban Motors, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Votaw v. Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Interinsurance Exchange v. VeljiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Savnik v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Joyce O'Neilin v. Allstate Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018