Legal Opinion

Votaw v. Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1940No. Sac. 5143PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The defendants have appealed from an adverse judgment in an action on an insurance policy.

The plaintiff, as the owner of an automobile, was insured against so-called public liability by a policy issued February 6, 1931. The defendant insurance companies were the insurers. After the policy was issued the plaintiff sold the automobile to one Kin on an oral contract of conditional sale under which Kin paid a portion of the purchase price and received possession of the car. The plaintiff retained both the certificate of ownership and the certificate of registration which had been issued to him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bunch v. KinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Sly v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Firkins v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Swift v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Stoddart v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Collins v. New York Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API