Lund v. Bruflat
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Respondent’s amended complaint in this action alleges two separate causes of action, both founded upon quantum meruit, to separately foreclose a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien for labor and material claimed to have been furnished in installing a plumbing and heating plant in a duplex building in Seattle belonging to appellants, and furnished under contract with them. A trial to the court without a jury resulted in a judgment denying the foreclosure of any lien, because of its untimely filing, but granting a money judgment against appellants in the sum of $535 with costs.
From the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Richey v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Sherwood v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Tacoma v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dow v. United States Ex Rel. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Mundell v. GraphSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton v. Phillips Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Carter v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Ogilvy v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.