Legal Opinion

Mundell v. Graph

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1934No. File No. 7677PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Chapter 61, Laws South Dakota 1927, is commonly known as the Barber Act, and is entitled as follows: “An Act Entitled, An Act Regulating the Practice of Barbering, Defining Such Practice, Providing for a Board of Examiners and the Issuance of 'Certificates to Practice Barbering, and Providing Penalties for Violation.”

Plaintiff resides in Deadwood in Lawrence county in this state, where for twenty-six years last past he has been engaged in the occupation of a barber, and where he continues to own, operate, and conduct a barber shop. When chapter 61, Laws 1927, went into effect plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Richey v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Knight v. JohnsMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gerard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Banghart v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Beaty v. Humphrey, State AuditorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Schneider v. DuerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Torigian v. SaundersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Berens v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API