Legal Opinion

Ogilvy v. Peck

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1939No. 27318. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In this case, the plaintiff alleged that defendants tore out the plumbing fixtures in his building without his knowledge or consent, and sought to recover the rental value of the building during a period of three months, in the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars. The defendants filed a cross-complaint, alleging that plaintiff and defendants entered into an agreement whereby defendants were to remove the old plumbing fixtures and install new fixtures in the building, which was being remodeled by plaintiff, and that, after the fixtures were removed and before the new fixtures were installed,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fox v. RogersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Wright v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Lund v. BruflatWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Spurgeon v. Imperial Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Yakima Lodge No. 53, K. of P. v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Schloss v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Measday v. SweazeaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Haberman v. ElledgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Goble v. GoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API