Legal Opinion

Dow v. United States Ex Rel. Holley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1946No. 3170PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

The United States awarded to R. H. Dow, engaged in business under the trade name of L. F. Dow Company, a prime contract for the construction of six warehouses at an army air base near Ogden, Utah; and a bond was executed and delivered, conditioned as required by the so-called Miller Act, 49 Stat. 793, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq. Dow entered into a subcontract with Ben J. Holley for the performance of that part of the work referred to as footing excavation. The contract provided that Holley should be compensated at the rate of fifty cents per cubic yard, bank…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Camden v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Massie v. DudleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nina C. Neu v. Frank Grant and Lorna Marie Grant, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. Fanderlik-Locke Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Sumner Development Corporation v. ShiversAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fanderlik-Locke Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API