Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Richey v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1906No. 5967PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court Eovember 21, 1905, for a writ of habeas corpus, to release from custody a plumber, convicted before a justice of the peace of engaging in the business of plumbing without having obtained a license.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

— The appellant was convicted before one of the justices of the peace of King county of the crime of engaging in the business of plumbing as a journeyman plumber, in violation of Section 12 of the Act of March 4, 1905, Laws 1905, pj. 126, entitled, “An act to- regulate plumbing in cities having a population of ten thousand inhabitants or over, providing for the licensing of persons to carry on the business and work of plumbing, creating a board of plumbing examiners, fixing the compensation of plumbing examiners, providing a penalty for the violation hereof and repealing all acts in conflict…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mitchell v. Consolidated School District No. 201Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. Bowen & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sherwood v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API