Legal Opinion

Warner Const. Co. v. Krug

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 25, 1948No. Civil No. 640—48PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the Warner Construction Company against Julius A. Krug, Secretary of the Interior, and the United States of America for equitable relief under Section 1 of the Act of August 7, 1946, which authorizes Government departments and agencies to adjust and settle equitable claims of Government contractors for losses incurred by them between September 16, 1940, and August 14, 1945. 1

Both defendants move for summary judgment, and in addition the United States of America moves to dismiss the complaint.

The Government contends that this action does…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. National Cored Forgings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. McGann Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Fogarty v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
  4. Pittston-Luzerne Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. United States v. Chas. M. Dunning Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API