Legal Opinion

Fogarty v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 28, 1948No. Civ. 883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, District Judge.

The petitioner as Trustee in Bankruptcy, prior to VJ-day, had asserted various claims against the Navy Department of the United States on contracts NOs 91957, NObs-147, NXs 3309 and supplements thereto for the construction of submarine chasers and plane rearming boats as contained in invoices submitted to the Department, and the Department had asserted claims against the petitioner. These parties entered into an agreement February 20, 1945, compromising and settling this controversy and the agreement was authorized and approved by this Court. Some of the work furnished by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Harrison v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. United States v. Chas. M. Dunning Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Acme Fur Dressing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1948
  5. Davidson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API