Legal Opinion

Pittston-Luzerne Corp. v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1949No. Civ. No. 3181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, Chief Judge.

This is a petition for an equitable determination praying for relief from alleged losses suffered in performance of contracts with the United States during the war. The action is brought under the War Contracts Hardship Claims Act, also known as the Lucas Act, c. 864, sections 1-6, 60 Stat. 902, as amended June 25, 1948, c. 646, section 37, 62 Stat. 992, 41 U.S.C.A. § 106 note.

The action is before the Court on a motion by defendants to dismiss the petition on the grounds that this Court is without jurisdiction of the subject matter, and that plaintiff has failed to state a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  2. Warner Const. Co. v. KrugDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
  3. Modern Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  4. McGann Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harry Hoy and Michael R. Schuster v. Progress Pattern CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Pittston-Luzerne Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Worth Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API