Legal Opinion

United States v. Chas. M. Dunning Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1955No. 4874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by Charles M. Dunning Construction Company, herein called the contractor, under the Lucas Act,1 as amended, to recover certain losses on a war contract. Trial was had to the court sitting as a court of equity. Judgment was entered in favor of the contractor and against the United States and the Department of the Army for $177,-526.01, together with costs of the action.

The Lucas Act provided for reimbursement of losses sustained by contractors on war contracts under certain conditions between September 16, 1940, to August 14,1945. During this period the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Reid v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walter W. Cowhig v. National Military EstablishmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. United States v. Dunning Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Walter W. Cowhig v. National Military EstablishmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API