Legal Opinion

National Cored Forgings Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 30, 1953No. 50420PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

In this case plaintiffs seek to recover the sum of $309,799.29, alleged to represent either fair compensation for services rendered without a formal contract under section 17(a) of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 665, 41 U.S.C.A. § 117(a), or damages for breach of contract by the defendant. As a third alternative, plaintiffs ask reformation of an agreement in writing on the ground of mutual mistake and of misrepresentations by the defendant, and damages for breach of the agreement as reformed. The case is before us on plaintiffs’ motion to strike special defenses…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Kaus v. HustonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1940
  4. Crooks Terminal Warehouses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  5. Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Boyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. National Cored Forgings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API