Legal Opinion

Brown v. Tennessee Auto Ins. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1951PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

The complainant Brown seeks to recover on an automobile insurance policy issued to cover certain trucks owned by the complainant. The defendant demurred to the bill which was sustained by the trial court on the ground that the accident was not covered by the policy. One of the trucks covered by the policy was in a collision at or near Camp Campbell, Kentucky, at a point about one mile north of the Tennessee-Ken tucky line. Suit was brought against the complainant Brown and there was recovery for $5',750'. The policy is standard in fonn and has an endorsement which reads in part as follows:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Young v. Harris-Cortner Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Camden F.I. Assn. v. N.B v. Hotel Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Coover v. DavenportTennessee Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ballard v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Winfree v. Educators Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Heyer-Jordan & Associates, Inc. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Taylor v. White Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API