Legal Opinion

Young v. Harris-Cortner Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1924PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This is a replevin suit, instituted in the chancery court by J. W. Young .against Harris-Cortner Company, a partnership, Weil Bros., a partnership, E. M. McNamee, and Hardeman County Farmers’ Union Warehouse, a Tennessee corporation, to recover the possession of ten bales of cotton.

The chancellor dismissed complainant’s bill, but, up-m appeal, the court of civil appeals reversed the chan-

Uor and decreed the cotton to complainant.

The cause is before us upon the petition of Harris-Cortner Company and Weil Bros, for writ of certiorari, in which errors are assigned on the decree of the court of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. People's State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Johnson v. IankovetzOregon Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brown v. Tennessee Auto Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Dobbins v. Martin Buick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Nicewarner v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Kirk v. MadsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API