Legal Opinion
Mandel v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 1926No. 24,906PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Action for rescission of a contract to buy real estate, on the ground of misrepresentation.
Plaintiff claimed that while snow was on the ground he bought two lots of defendant for the purpose of erecting a large apartment building thereon; that he informed defendant of the use intended and, having been informed that the lots had been filled in, inquired as to that fact; that defendant assured him that he had owned the lots for 20 years, and knew that the fill thereon did not exceed 7 feet. Relying on this representation plaintiff entered the contract to buy the lots for $4,300, and made a part…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Schmeisser v. AlbinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Rudolphi v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Dowden v. KanuchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Martin v. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Sievert v. LaMarcaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Dale v. First National Bank of RushmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.