State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TOMUANOYICH, Justice.
In this case we must decide the standard of proof to be applied in consumer fraud litigation. After a bench trial, Alpine Air Products [“Alpine”] and its president, William Converse were found liable for violations of Minnesota’s False Statement in Advertising Statute, 1 Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 2 and Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act. 3 The trial court applied a preponderance of the evidence standard and awarded a civil penalty. The court of appeals affirmed the use of this standard and the constitutionality of the penalty. State by Humphrey v. Alpine Air…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. LandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.