Legal Opinion

Dale v. First National Bank of Rushmore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1929No. 27,406PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Action to enjoin the foreclosure of a mortgage and to have the mortgage and note secured thereby canceled on .the ground of fraudulent representations claimed to have been made by the cashier of defendant bank in obtaining the mortgage and note. Prior to the bringing of the action defendant had commenced proceedings to foreclose the mortgage by advertisement and sale. Anna Dale brings the action as sole plaintiff. The mortgage and note were given by Anna Dale and Jacob Dale, her husband. The mortgaged real estate is owned by Anna Dale alone and is not a homestead of either husband or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eisenlord v. . ClumNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Doty's Adm'r v. Doty's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Perine v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Marvin v. DutcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  5. Swingley v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MollanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Mitchell v. MortenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Salscheider v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Cloud v. Realty Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Fikkan v. HolterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API