Legal Opinion

Dowden v. Kanuch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1924No. 23,591PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action by the plaintiff, vendor in a contract for the sale of farm lands, against the defendant, vendee in the contract, for specific *76performance. There were findings for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The defendant alleged fraudulent representations made by the agents of the plaintiff relative to the character of the lands inducing the contract. The issue of fraud was submitted to a jury which found against the defendant.

The court charged that the burden of proving fraud rested on the defendant; that “the law presumes all men act fairly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmeisser v. AlbinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berryman v. RiegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Hafner v. RitzingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Klapmeier v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  5. Rother v. HinikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API