Legal Opinion
Olen F. Featherstone and Martha Featherstone v. Max Barash
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1965No. 7804_1PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
This is an action by an attorney to collect fees, in which the determinative question on appeal is the sufficiency of the trial court’s findings.
■ The plaintiff Max Barash (appellee here), alleged in his complaint that he had been employed to represent the defendants Olen F. Featherstone and Martha Featherstone (appellants) 1 in administrative proceedings involving extensive federal oil and gas leases, the reasonable value of the services being $96,000.00, $11,000.00 of which had been paid. Judgment was demanded for the claimed balance of $85,000.00. The…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kelley v. Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In Re Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors. Fowler Brothers v. Robert J. Young and Donna M. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Mabel Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Anderson v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Gulf King Shrimp Company v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Lasalle Extension University & Katharine Gibbs School (Inc.) v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.