Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City of Albuquerque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1982No. 80-1679PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Kirsten Anderson instituted this class action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging that the City of Albuquerque discriminated on the basis of sex in its employment practices. The trial court denied Anderson’s motion to certify the class. It also held that the position for which Anderson unsuccessfully applied was exempt from Title VII coverage under section 701(f), 42 U.S.C. 2000e(f), and in any event that no violation of Title VII had occurred with respect to her individual claim. On appeal Anderson contends that: (1) the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Adamson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. DG Ex Rel. Stricklin v. DeVaughnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Shook v. El Paso CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Starrett v. WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Walter McAlester v. United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API