Kelley v. Everglades Drainage District
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
In this case we are asked to review a plan for composition of the debts of respondent, a drainage district organized under the laws of Florida. The courts below have confirmed the plan under § 83 (e) of the Bankruptcy Act, 50 Stat. 653, 658, 11 U. S. C. § 403 (e), as amended, upon the finding of the District Court, prerequisite to the adoption of the plan, that it is “fair, equitable, and for the best interests of the creditors and does not discriminate unfairly in favor of any creditor or class of creditors.” 132 F. 2d 742.
Petitioners are holders of interest coupons, detached from bonds…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ecker v. Western Pacific R. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- American United Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Giles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Tina Deal v. The Cincinnati Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.