Legal Opinion
Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 26, 1940No. 270PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
The appellees, corporations of Florida and other States, and individuals, engaged in, the canning of citrus fruits in that State, filed their bill in the District Court for Southern Florida against Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of Florida, praying injunctions, temporary and final, to restrain him from cancelling their licenses as citrus fruit dealers, from enforcing against them a regulation made pursuant to a state statute, and from interfering with the conduct of their business by reason of their failure to comply with the statute.
On presentation of the bill and motion for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.