Legal Opinion

Frost v. Ayojiak

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1998No. S-7781PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Paul Frost, Laura Frost, and Annie Fox (the Frosts) appeal the superior court’s order denying their Alaska Civil Rule 60(b) motion and granting Moses Ayojiak’s Civil Rule 60(a) motion. We conclude that the superior court erred in holding that ejecting the Frosts from Lot 3, rather than Lot 3B, was a “clerical error” and in holding that Ayojiak had had standing to eject them from Lot 3B when he brought his ejectment action. The errors committed by the superior court were not harmless. We reverse the order ejecting the Frosts from Lot 3B and remand for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Alaskan Village, Inc. v. Smalley Ex Rel. SmalleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Babinec v. YabukiAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Cleary Diving Service, Inc. v. Thomas, Head & GreisenAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mapco Express, Inc. v. FaulkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Askinuk Corp. v. Lower Yukon School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Young v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Guerrero v. GuerreroAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API