Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Four U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc. workers brought suit alleging that they had been exposed to asbestos while working at a construction project at Providence Hospital in Anchorage. The general contractor on the project, Hoffman Construction, settled the suit, and sought indemnity and defense costs from subcontractor U.S. Fabrication & Erecetion, Inc. (USF & E) under a contractual indemnity provision; however, USF & E simultaneously claimed indemnity and defense from Hoffman under an implied contractual theory. Providence also sought indemnity and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- John A. Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- McNally & Nimergood v. Neumann-Kiewit Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Rodvik v. RodvikAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.