Legal Opinion

Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2001No. S-9116PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Four U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc. workers brought suit alleging that they had been exposed to asbestos while working at a construction project at Providence Hospital in Anchorage. The general contractor on the project, Hoffman Construction, settled the suit, and sought indemnity and defense costs from subcontractor U.S. Fabrication & Erecetion, Inc. (USF & E) under a contractual indemnity provision; however, USF & E simultaneously claimed indemnity and defense from Hoffman under an implied contractual theory. Providence also sought indemnity and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. John A. Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. McNally & Nimergood v. Neumann-Kiewit Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Rodvik v. RodvikAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API