Legal Opinion

Cleary Diving Service, Inc. v. Thomas, Head & Greisen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1984No. 7795PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal arises out a cause of action by Eugene and Florence Cleary (and Cleary Diving Service, Inc.), the appellants, alleging that Thomas, Head and Greisen, a professional accounting corporation, and Donald Thomas and Theodore Sherwin (hereafter “the defendants”) improperly performed accounting services for the Clearys. The cause of action was eventually dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution by the superior court, Judge Daniel A. Moore, Jr. presiding. This appeal is from a 60(b) motion attacking that dismissal. We affirm.

First, we conclude that the Clearys were not…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. McCracken v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Farrell Ex Rel. Farrell v. Dome LaboratoriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Balchen v. BalchenAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Shiffman v. "K", Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alaskan Village, Inc. v. Smalley Ex Rel. SmalleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nelson v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hermosillo v. HermosilloAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dwane J. Sykes v. Jay T. Lawless and Jeannie L. EnglishAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Bennett v. HedglinAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API