United States v. Paul Silva
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether a defendant has a right to allocute during a limited remand to the district court from a sentencing appeal.
I
A jury in the Southern District of California convicted appellant Paul Silva of importation of marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The district judge held a sentencing hearing, in which he considered the Probation Officer’s Report, Silva’s Sentencing Memorandum and Departure Request, the Addendum to the Probation Officer’s Report, and the Government’s Sentencing Summary Chart. He expressly asked Silva whether…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Sylvester Norman Knows His Gun, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. BergetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- United States v. Bernardo SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Marcelino Aguilar-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. SandonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.