Legal Opinion

United States v. Bernardo Sanchez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 23, 2009No. 07-50564PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether, on a limited Ameline remand, a district court may consider post-sentencing factors and circumstances in determining whether it would have imposed the same sentence had it known the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory.

BACKGROUND

Gabriel Bernardo Sanchez (“Sanchez”) was convicted of thirty-three counts of mail fraud and eleven counts of money laundering, in connection with an extensive charitable donation scam. Sanchez and his partner formed a “shell” church, and then employed telemarketers to solicit donations on behalf…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Kevin Davis, at No. 02-4521 Kevin A. Minnis, at No. 03-1130 Reginal Scott, at No. 03-1160Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. United States v. Joseph BlacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  3. Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. ArenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API