Legal Opinion
United States v. Sandon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2008No. 06-10543PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*720MEMORANDUM **
Mark Sandon appeals his 210-month sentence upheld by the district court on a limited Ameline remand. Because the parties are familiar with the history of this case, we will not recount it here.
I
The purpose of an Ameline remand is to ascertain whether treating the Guidelines as mandatory resulted in an “error affecting] substantial rights, by determining whether the sentence would have been materially different under advisory Guidelines.” United States v. Thornton, 511 F.3d 1221, 1225 (9th Cir.2008). In order to conduct a proper Ameline review, the district judge should evaluate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Chung Ping Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aguilar-Turcios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Aguilar-Turcios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Aguilar-Turcios v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009