United States v. Williams
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
*1068 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S OMNIBUS PENALTY PHASE MOTIONS IN LIMINE, DOC. NO. 2605
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The government’s April 21, 2014 Omnibus Penalty Phase Motions in Limine seek to exclude four categories of evidence from the selection phase of this capital murder trial (in the event that the jury determines that Defendant Naeem Williams (“Defendant”) is eligible for a sentence of death). See Doc. No. 2605. Defendant filed an Opposition April 27, 2014, Doc. No. 2639, and argument was heard on May 5, 2014. Based on the following,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baton v. Ledger SASDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Henrietta Mine LLC v. A.M. King Industries IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Henrietta Mine LLC v. A.M. King Industries IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Jackson v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Mai v. Supercell OyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.