Naftalin v. King
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
*499By Ex. Sess. L. 1959, c. 90, the legislature appropriated from the Minnesota State Building Fund to the commissioner of administration $38,049,982; to the commissioner of conservation $487,480; and to the regents of the University of Minnesota $14,457,150; making an aggregate, including reappropriations, of $52,994,612. Such appropriations are by specific items stating the location, institution, and particular purpose of each expenditure.
The question now presented…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Park v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Fleckten v. LambertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Naftalin v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. VictorsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Johnson v. CummiskeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Minnesota Energy & Economic Development Authority v. PrintySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.