Legal Opinion
Park v. Employment Security Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1959No. Docket 43, 44, Calendar 47,065, 47,124PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
These cases are of great financial importance to the litigants. Yet, after a careful review of over 1,600 printed pages of records and briefs, we conclude that they turn upon the answer to a relatively simple legal question — Does the term “the establishment,” as used in the Michigan employment security act, encompass both Ford plants in the vicinity of Detroit, Michigan, and the Ford forge plant at Canton, Ohio, for the reason that the former cannot operate long without the latter?
The question is by no means new. In very similar form, it has previously been submitted to the judicial systems…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Parker v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.